Current:Home > InvestFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -TradeWisdom
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:28:23
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (1172)
Related
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Environmental Justice Grabs a Megaphone in the Climate Movement
- Indiana police officer Heather Glenn and man killed as confrontation at hospital leads to gunfire
- Pairing Wind + Solar for Cheaper, 24-Hour Renewable Energy
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Warming Trends: The ‘Cranky Uncle’ Game, Good News About Bowheads and Steps to a Speedier Energy Transition
- Appalachia Could Get a Giant Solar Farm, If Ohio Regulators Approve
- 2 Courts Upheld State Nuclear Subsidies. Here’s Why It’s a Big Deal for Renewable Energy, Too.
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Vanderpump Rules' Lala Kent Slams Narcissist Tom Sandoval For Ruining Raquel Leviss' Life
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Election 2018: Clean Energy’s Future Could Rise or Fall with These Governor’s Races
- Game-Winning Father's Day Gift Ideas for the Sports Fan Dad
- JoJo Siwa's Bold Hair Transformation Is Perfect If You're Torn Between Going Blonde or Brunette
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Natural Gas Rush Drives a Global Rise in Fossil Fuel Emissions
- Tatcha Flash Sale Alert: Get Over $400 Worth of Amazing Skincare Products for $140
- Kim Zolciak Won't Be Tardy to Drop Biermann From Her Instagram Name
Recommendation
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
Lady Gaga Will Give You a Million Reasons to Love Her Makeup-Free Selfies
With Democratic Majority, Climate Change Is Back on U.S. House Agenda
Confidential Dakota Pipeline Memo: Standing Rock Not a Disadvantaged Community Impacted by Pipeline
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
1.5 Degrees Warming and the Search for Climate Justice for the Poor
California Farmers Work to Create a Climate Change Buffer for Migratory Water Birds
Man in bulletproof vest fatally shoots 5, injures 2 in Philadelphia; suspect in custody